Undeniably, one of the most debated subjects in the US these days is sports gambling. Now that states have the legal authority to authorize the activity, more and more lawmakers are pushing to introduce bills to see their states capitalize on the multi-billion-dollar market. The topic has been the source of political in-fighting in more than one jurisdiction, and the state of Colorado is no different. However, Cynthia Coffman, Colorado’s Attorney General (AG), has said that advancing sports betting operations in the state should be easier than the opponents would have many believe.

In a formal legal opinion published by the AG, she said, “The Colorado Constitution does not prohibit or otherwise restrict commercial sports betting. Whether or not to amend state statutes to authorize commercial sports betting is a policy question for the General Assembly and the voters of this State.”

Many legal experts were under the impression that a statewide vote leading to a change to the state’s Constitution was going to be required for lawmakers to consider sports gambling. “Whether a game is a lottery turns on the role that chance plays in the outcome,” says Coffman. Since sports gambling certainly does not rely on chance, Coffman concludes that “wagering on a sporting event falls outside this definition.”

Casinos weren’t too pleased with the AG’s position. The Colorado Gaming Association (CGA) posted a rebuttal, stating, “The Colorado courts only give ‘respectful consideration’ to attorney general opinions and, many times, find that an AG’s opinion is incorrect. The weight of judicial authority throughout the country is that sports betting is, in fact, a ‘lottery.’ Attorney General Coffman’s conclusion that horse and dog racing are ‘not materially different’ than professional and collegiate sports betting is factually and, we believe, legally incorrect.”